SCO And Its Lawsuit Against Linux

Ghost [PX] · Post by **Ghost [PX]** » Wed Mar 03, 2004 3:33 pm

Whats that sound I hear?

Why its the death rattle of SCO! The linux community already disproved their claims, and now they're targeting 2 fortune 500 companies, one of them Daimler-Chrysler no less, with lawsuits that they're sure to lose....

Morons.

THE JEW (RaVeN) · Post by **THE JEW (RaVeN)** » Wed Mar 03, 2004 3:37 pm

Yeah, I'm hoping they counter sue for................anything.

Ghost [PX] · Post by **Ghost [PX]** » Wed Mar 03, 2004 3:41 pm

SCO is finished as far as Im concerned...

They've attempted to push around the little guys, they got ignored. Now they're going to try and push around some big boys, and get slapped down hard. You bet your ass Chrysler will counter-sue. Probably for damages and anything else they can.

Ghost [PX] · Post by **Ghost [PX]** » Fri Mar 05, 2004 7:01 pm

http://news.com.com/2100-7344_3-5170181.html?tag=nefd_top

SCO funded By Microsoft... SCO Denies... World Rolls Eyes...

THE JEW (RaVeN) · Post by **THE JEW (RaVeN)** » Thu Jun 10, 2004 8:40 pm

SCO loses money:

http://news.com.com/SCO+revenue+takes+a ... g=nefd.top

Surprise, surprise, eh?

THE JEW (RaVeN) · Post by **THE JEW (RaVeN)** » Fri Nov 12, 2004 7:17 pm

BWUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?stor ... 0033306403

:lol:

SCO's fscked.

THE JEW (RaVeN) · Post by **THE JEW (RaVeN)** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 10:42 am

Unbe-frickin'-leviable.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=s ... ech_sco_dc

Here's to IBM and their appeal.

[PX]Kal Bob · Post by **[PX]Kal Bob** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 11:32 am

The articels title is miss-leading, they did not win anything. The court is just ordering the Code into evidence, I don't understand why they did not just give them this in the first place. It does not help SCO as far as I can see.

obtaining this important discovery

THE JEW (RaVeN) · Post by **THE JEW (RaVeN)** » Fri Jan 21, 2005 3:08 pm

It's considered a "loss" because IBM had been saying that there was no reason for them to turn over their proprietary code.

I agree that it's not actually a loss, but the fact that the courts are taking SCO even semi-seriously when the code in question was given away free years ago blows my mind. I don't see why IBM should've had to turn over their code.

[PX]Kal Bob · Post by **[PX]Kal Bob** » Sat Feb 12, 2005 9:56 am

The Judge wrote:"Despite the vast disparity between SCO's public accusations and its actual evidence--or complete lack thereof--and the resulting temptation to grant IBM's motion

Does not sould good for SCO.... :mrgreen:

http://news.com.com/Judge+slams+SCOs+lack+of+evidence+against+IBM/2100-7344_3-5570265.html?tag=nefd.top

THE JEW (RaVeN) · Post by **THE JEW (RaVeN)** » Sat Feb 12, 2005 9:35 pm

Excellent.

Odd as this may sound, I hope IBM counter sues.

THE JEW (RaVeN) · Post by **THE JEW (RaVeN)** » Tue Nov 08, 2005 1:23 pm

SCO shows just how dumb they really are:

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?stor ... 6172616929

Kernel 2.7, eh?

THE JEW (RaVeN) · Post by **THE JEW (RaVeN)** » Wed Feb 22, 2006 5:00 pm

IBM wants blood:

http://news.com.com/IBM+issues+subpoena ... ?tag=st_lh

Going after whoever was linked to SCO. I say go for it.

THE JEW (RaVeN) · Post by **THE JEW (RaVeN)** » Sat Feb 25, 2006 6:57 pm

Wow.

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?stor ... 4192617648

SCO admits its subpoenas were faulty. They haven't a hope of winning it seems.

THE JEW (RaVeN) · Post by **THE JEW (RaVeN)** » Mon Mar 26, 2007 10:09 pm

SCO tries to rewrite its past:

http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Stocks_(A_to_Z)/Stocks_S/threadview?m=tm&bn=2942&tid=415572&mid=415572&tof=5&frt=2