KalNet Message Board

Apparently, the whole "30 frames is enough" is false:

http://amo.net/NT/02-21-01FPS.html

USAF studies show that we can tell the difference all the way up to 220 fps. And you mock my fugly Quake 3

220 gee thy must be un human then

The humen (to my understanding) can only tell the difference under 12fps now if they guys can get it up to 220 then (in my opinion) there not human

Actually it has been generally accepted that the human eye can distinguish up to 30 fps. The article (which is welll written so far) seems to be well researched and might actually ring true.