Mac's aren't all bad...
Posted: Tue May 27, 2003 6:46 pm
I want an iPod, they're just cool. I wouldn't want to use a Mac for gaming. Why would I? I have a kick ass PC for that.
I know that the people at Apple might disagree with me. That's fine. It's their responsibility to their stockholders and the survival of the company to push the Macintosh as the superior platform and encourage people to switch over. It's a necessity of staying in business and I understand it coming from them. I just don't understanding it coming from consumers.
Look, computers are just like any other product or tool. Find what you like and use it. I don't understand why it has to be so "us vs. them" on the consumer level. Coke HAS to say it's better than Pepsi. That's just how it works. But we as consumers don't have to choose along such deliberate lines. Can't you be in the mood for both at different times? Is there anything wrong with that? How hard is it to juggle two different thoughts in your head at once? Is it really THAT difficult to walk and chew gum at the same time? Do I need to be attacked for wanting to do that?
I like Macs. I like the simplicity and the idea of one company making all the pieces. They're impossible to upgrade, but they're great for people like my mum who read their mail and chat to friends. More than anything, I like the idea of starting over with something new. It's a whole new platform to learn and explore and so far, it's been very appealing and impressive to me. I've been using Windows and Microsoft products exclusively for over 10 years. The idea of change is inviting. I am starting with Linux too so why not Mac OS which is built on a Unix base.
The only thing more annoying than a PC user telling me why I don't want a Mac is a Mac user telling me why I should want one. I'm tired of everyone pelting me with arguments for one side or the other.
My question then is this: can't we find a way for both Macs and PCs to co-exist?
I know that the people at Apple might disagree with me. That's fine. It's their responsibility to their stockholders and the survival of the company to push the Macintosh as the superior platform and encourage people to switch over. It's a necessity of staying in business and I understand it coming from them. I just don't understanding it coming from consumers.
Look, computers are just like any other product or tool. Find what you like and use it. I don't understand why it has to be so "us vs. them" on the consumer level. Coke HAS to say it's better than Pepsi. That's just how it works. But we as consumers don't have to choose along such deliberate lines. Can't you be in the mood for both at different times? Is there anything wrong with that? How hard is it to juggle two different thoughts in your head at once? Is it really THAT difficult to walk and chew gum at the same time? Do I need to be attacked for wanting to do that?
I like Macs. I like the simplicity and the idea of one company making all the pieces. They're impossible to upgrade, but they're great for people like my mum who read their mail and chat to friends. More than anything, I like the idea of starting over with something new. It's a whole new platform to learn and explore and so far, it's been very appealing and impressive to me. I've been using Windows and Microsoft products exclusively for over 10 years. The idea of change is inviting. I am starting with Linux too so why not Mac OS which is built on a Unix base.
The only thing more annoying than a PC user telling me why I don't want a Mac is a Mac user telling me why I should want one. I'm tired of everyone pelting me with arguments for one side or the other.
My question then is this: can't we find a way for both Macs and PCs to co-exist?