Page 1 of 3

Patents

Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 11:48 am
by THE JEW (RaVeN)
Unused patents?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070318/ap_ ... ed_patents

Groups ask companies to release unused patents so that entrepreneurs can attempt to make something of them.

Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 9:23 pm
by THE JEW (RaVeN)
M$ says that Linux violates patents:

http://www.networkworld.com/community/?q=node/15111


............but this site says "that's just old FUD."

http://techdirt.com/articles/20070514/013229.shtml

Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 7:04 pm
by THE JEW (RaVeN)
Torvald tells M$ to put up or shut up about the patents:

http://www.informationweek.com/news/sho ... =199600443

He says they'll code around any problems and what with IBM owning the majority of patents on what an OS is (though, most likely irrelevant due to age), he dares M$ to prove they're just not saber rattling.

Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 4:17 pm
by THE JEW (RaVeN)
Mr. Hilf, the director of open source at M$, responds about the patent article and (indirectly) to Linus Torvald:

http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,13194 ... ticle.html

Posted: Mon May 21, 2007 2:09 pm
by THE JEW (RaVeN)
Has M$ inadvertently short-changed their patent rights?

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?stor ... 8124020691

Posted: Mon May 21, 2007 9:34 pm
by THE JEW (RaVeN)
Another POV on the whole M$, GPL3, and voucher thinger:

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20 ... noise.html

Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 7:12 pm
by THE JEW (RaVeN)
Torvald comments on GPL3 and the M$/Novell agreement:

http://www.linuxworld.com/cgi-bin/mailt ... lw_general

Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 5:47 pm
by THE JEW (RaVeN)
This sounds good at first:

http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financia ... GR90O0.htm

But it will only likely protect corporations that make obscure patents that prevent true inventors from making a buck.

Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:38 am
by THE JEW (RaVeN)
M$ says Red Hat will eventually have to pay:

http://www.windowsitpro.com/Articles/Ar ... 97281.html

The author, quite astutely, notes that unless they start naming patents they're no better than SCO. And we all know how that turned out ;)

Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 11:45 am
by THE JEW (RaVeN)
Wow. That was quick:

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?stor ... 1205044141

M$, under the table, sues Novell and Red Hat.

NOTE: Novell, who made an arrangement with M$, is getting sued. Making deals with the devil still ends you up in the lakes of sulphur.

Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 11:01 am
by THE JEW (RaVeN)
Europe, basically, tells M$ to bugger off when it comes to patent saber rattling:

http://www.itnews.com.au/News/63623,eu- ... -dogs.aspx

Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:16 pm
by THE JEW (RaVeN)
If Sun wins its patent case, it will donate part of the earnings to preventing frivolous cases:


http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/07/11/06/0332228.shtml

Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 9:27 am
by THE JEW (RaVeN)
I really think M$ and Autodesk should've won this one:

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g21c ... AD8T5M4PG4

Patenting using 2 passwords for installation gets you $140 million? Please.

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:43 am
by THE JEW (RaVeN)
Some university profs are suing Intel over cpu patents:

http://warf.org/news/news.jsp?news_id=221

Essentially, parts which made the Core 2 Duo line so great infringe on their patents (according to them).

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 7:15 pm
by THE JEW (RaVeN)
Patents and constitutional rights:

http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/08/04/30/0045243.shtml