Page 1 of 14
RIAA at it again... er still
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2003 1:45 pm
by Tempus
what the hell is with all the law suits ? crikey these guys just dont give up... they lost their suit against Grokster so now they are going after iMesh... those damn bastards leave my p2p alone.... with mirc servers being shotty at best iMesh is the best i can do for now... speaking of which does anyone know any progs like mirc where i can contiune my ... um 'research'? or perhaps other decent mirc servers?
anyways heres the article
http://news.com.com/2100-1025_3-5079454.html
Posted: Mon Mar 29, 2004 1:32 pm
by THE JEW (RaVeN)
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/03/ ... 34274.html
Bullsh1t like this p1sses me off. Record sales are up so they're fudging the numbers so that they're cases in court will be won. So now they make more money off record sales
and collect money from people who download. Fark record execs.
Posted: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:10 pm
by [Fallen]Thanatos
govenmet has to get the shair off all sales.
They hate it when people get stuff for free. they hate that word "free"
Posted: Tue Mar 30, 2004 12:58 am
by THE JEW (RaVeN)
Our government does get their share. We're charged a tax on all recordable media that goes directly to them. That's why it's going to be interesting to see what happens now that the Canadian Recording Industry is suing downloaders. We pay the tax for the goods.............why can't we download? Not to mention we have much different copyright laws.
Posted: Tue Mar 30, 2004 2:23 am
by [PX]IronFist
THE JEW (RaVeN) wrote:Our government does get their share. We're charged a tax on all recordable media that goes directly to them. That's why it's going to be interesting to see what happens now that the Canadian Recording Industry is suing downloaders. We pay the tax for the goods.............why can't we download? Not to mention we have much different copyright laws.
Are you sure that the CRI is suing downloaders? I would be interested to see an article on this.
Posted: Tue Mar 30, 2004 3:01 am
by THE JEW (RaVeN)
Yup.
Here, where you asked last time, is where they say they're gonna start most likely:
http://kalnet.kalshadowtech.com/php/php ... anada+riaa
Here it talks about the actual lawsuits:
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/02/13/1551232
It's the reason I switched to mIRC instead of Kazaa, eDonkey, and BitTorrent. Well, that and AutoGet simply kicks @$$.
EDIT:
When they bust down your door, you might wanna reference the article I linked to near the bottom of this page:
http://kalnet.kalshadowtech.com/php/php ... light=riaa
I thought I had mentioned the CRIA thing before, but can't find it.
Posted: Tue Mar 30, 2004 4:16 am
by [PX]IronFist
Your first article is questionable at best, and I remembered that from last time, that's why I asked again.
Here is a link to the actual article slashdot used.
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/1076683398081_54/?hub=SciTech
It doesn't sound like any of the suits have reached any customers yet and I think there is a good chance they could be thrown out. Although this sounds bad:
The industry said this is just the first wave of such suits, that more are coming, and they won't stop until Canadian music pirates are punished.
They are clearly suing only uploaders, not downloaders as you suggested.
This is a link to an FAQ about digital media copyrights in Canada
http://neil.eton.ca/copylevy.shtml#copy_for_friends
In anycase they won't be busting down
my door. I don't share any mp3's on peer-to-peer, and under the current law it is quite legal to download.
Posted: Tue Mar 30, 2004 12:04 pm
by THE JEW (RaVeN)
Yeah, but pretty much anyone who uses Kazaa or Bit Torrent does upload at the same time. With Bit Torrent, it's mandatory (unless you block off the ports on your firewall, anyways). For some reason, our news media only covers the suits south of the border with fanfare and not here. Thus, we have very little idea how far the charges/suits have gone.
So far they've only targeted uploaders, but I wouldn't put it past them to target downloaders. They might not win (probably won't), but the court fee alone would be something that most people wouldn't want. They're not out to break even--they're just out to bugger around.
Plus, we all know it was you who stole the HL2 code.
EDIT:
Seemed relavent:
http://news.com.com/2100-1027_3-5181562 ... g=nefd_top
Posted: Tue Mar 30, 2004 12:32 pm
by [PX]IronFist
*begins playing HL2*
You can't proove anything.

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2004 4:36 am
by THE JEW (RaVeN)
Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2004 9:35 am
by [PX]IronFist
That sucks..I wonder how much luck they will have trying to persecute people in these other countries though.
I just can't believe that other groups see the RIAA's tactics as effective enough to implement them for themselves.
On another note maybe we should all let ourselves get the MyDoom virus, it seems to target the RIAA.
http://news.com.com/2100-7355_3-5177326.html?tag=st_rn
Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2004 11:49 pm
by [PX]IronFist
It's all Legal baby....Download, Download, Download!!!!! (and Upload.

)
http://www.cbc.ca/stories/print/2004/03/31/canada/download_court040331
As of Today, Wednesday the 31st of March file sharing is legal in Canada. The courts ruled the CRIA has no right to sue people who make files available over P2P filesharing networks.
Posted: Thu Apr 01, 2004 12:10 am
by THE JEW (RaVeN)
Dude, that's frickin' awesome. Apparently, our discussion here on Kalnet made the courts see the light. Good work, Homey J. Now we just need to start talking about beastial....................errrrr, nevermind.
Appeals are bad, though. Hopefully, they stand by this.
Posted: Thu Apr 01, 2004 12:56 am
by Ghost [PX]
w00t!
Way to go Court system!
Posted: Thu Apr 01, 2004 12:58 am
by [PX]IronFist
THE JEW (RaVeN) wrote:Dude, that's frickin' awesome. Apparently, our discussion here on Kalnet made the courts see the light. Good work, Homey J. Now we just need to start talking about beastial....................errrrr, nevermind.

Appeals are bad, though. Hopefully, they stand by this.
Yah, there is still a chance the Supreme court could turn over the ruling, but I don't really see why they would. The law is pretty clear.