Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2003 7:18 pm
Not to mention you would also have to make it RWD.
http://www.warehousemotors.com/store/item.asp?id=253
Dempsey should so do this to his car.
Or not.
Page 6 of 24
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2004 12:29 pm
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2004 12:48 pm
I'm gonna suggest not
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2004 5:49 pm
I love the "rear door removal mod"
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2004 4:31 am
My car doesnt have rear doors already and what it needs now is a pile of repairs
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2004 3:52 pm
Apparently, lot's of people try to car surf:
http://www.newscoast.com/apps/pbcs.dll/ ... 20569/1060
Yet another Jack@$$ death/injury:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/Default.aspx?id=4000063&p1=0
Airborne for 75 feet? Impressive.
http://www.newscoast.com/apps/pbcs.dll/ ... 20569/1060
Yet another Jack@$$ death/injury:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/Default.aspx?id=4000063&p1=0
Airborne for 75 feet? Impressive.
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2004 2:30 pm
This is NOT a real car:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/3528757.stm
The hood? There is none. No tinkering allowed. If this is the ideal female car, we need to tar and feather every male ever caught driving one.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/3528757.stm
The hood? There is none. No tinkering allowed. If this is the ideal female car, we need to tar and feather every male ever caught driving one.
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2004 4:27 pm
Governor's were bad enough:
http://www.wired.com/news/autotech/0,25 ... _tophead_9
Cars of the future look like they're gonna suck.
http://www.wired.com/news/autotech/0,25 ... _tophead_9
Cars of the future look like they're gonna suck.
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2004 5:20 pm
Note to self: Don't buy cars in the future.
Which it won't let you use.
I can't see this car really having any appeal, who is going to pay for a car that restricts how you can drive it.
And it would sport a 240-horsepower engine.
Which it won't let you use.
I can't see this car really having any appeal, who is going to pay for a car that restricts how you can drive it.
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2004 5:22 pm
We buy cars today with governors. Maybe our kids will actually be that dumb. Our parents prolly say we our for buying cars that restrict how fast we can go.
Time to break out that 50's coupe, eh?
Time to break out that 50's coupe, eh?
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2004 5:24 pm
The governor is supposed to stop you from exploding the engine. There is a difference between restriction to prevent engine damage and restriction for the sake of restriction.
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2004 5:26 pm
Im not very well versed in privacy laws, but Im pretty sure a car like this would infringe on rights in some way... Of course, if you're stupid enough to buy it....
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2004 5:34 pm
Yeah, but everyone just uses governor's now to set your top speed. What with modern techniques in engineering, you can't begin to tell me that Homey B or Pimpin Matt's vehicles can't go faster than 170 kph. It might not be healthy, but they should easily handle it. Heck, the Intrepid does 195 kph easily................well, it used to 
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2004 5:39 pm
A little too easily I guess eh.
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2004 5:42 pm
Thats not the problem...
The problem was letting Jason's sisters drive it. I dont think any vehicle can survive that for an extended period of time.
The problem was letting Jason's sisters drive it. I dont think any vehicle can survive that for an extended period of time.