Page 13 of 14
Re: RIAA at it again... er still
Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 9:54 am
by THE JEW (RaVeN)
Re: RIAA at it again... er still
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 10:11 am
by THE JEW (RaVeN)
Paramount finally showing some sense:
http://entertainment.slashdot.org/story ... art_pos=39Rentals available same day as sales.
Re: RIAA at it again... er still
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 10:22 am
by THE JEW (RaVeN)
UK RIAA goes after Google using US DMCA law:
http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/06/19/ ... art_pos=13This could definitely set a bad precedent. Choosing other countries laws willy-nilly? What's the point of having your own?
Re: RIAA at it again... er still
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 8:02 am
by THE JEW (RaVeN)
Former Pink Floyd manager says the RIAA is wasting its time:
http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/07/14/ ... yd-Manager
Re: RIAA at it again... er still
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 8:34 pm
by THE JEW (RaVeN)
Those lawyers suing on behalf of
The Hurt Locker?http://torrentfreak.com/u-s-copyright-g ... te-100730/Yeah, they stole their website.
Re: RIAA at it again... er still
Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2010 10:15 pm
by THE JEW (RaVeN)
It's kinda awesome when things bite the lawyers representing these people in the @$$:
http://torrentfreak.com/acslaw-anti-pir ... ls-100925/
Re: RIAA at it again... er still
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2011 8:06 pm
by THE JEW (RaVeN)
Re: RIAA at it again... er still
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2011 8:01 am
by THE JEW (RaVeN)
Re: RIAA at it again... er still
Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2011 11:40 am
by THE JEW (RaVeN)
Bad article title, but a Village Person wants to claim ownership of his music due termination rights (ie. 35 years)
https://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/17/arts ... .html?_r=1
Re: RIAA at it again... er still
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 5:18 am
by THE JEW (RaVeN)
Hurt Locker lawsuits coming to Canada:
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news ... canada.arsDidn't know this about this bill:
Geist pointed out that the prospect of thousands of P2P file sharing suits making their way to Canada makes him all the more grateful for Canada's Bill C-32. The copyright modernization bill makes the distinction between commercial and noncommercial infringers, and limits statutory damages on noncommercial infringers to a maximum of CAN$5,000 for all infringements. "This case confirms that mass lawsuits with the threat of thousands in liability is a real possibility in Canada and why changes to the law are needed," Geist wrote.
Re: RIAA at it again... er still
Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 6:49 pm
by THE JEW (RaVeN)
Re: RIAA at it again... er still
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 10:33 am
by THE JEW (RaVeN)
CRIAA told to pay artists they "stole" from $50 million:
http://news.slashdot.org/story/11/11/16 ... nt-damagesTheir response:
"Time to sue our insurance agency."
Now it gets interesting

Re: RIAA at it again... er still
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 8:35 pm
by THE JEW (RaVeN)
Google asks the judge to make the RIAA clarify whether mp3's are tangible or intangible goods:
http://yro.slashdot.org/story/12/02/02/ ... oin-redigiAbout time somebody called them on the Italian pharse: avere la botte piena e la moglie ubriaca ("to have the barrel full and the wife drunk")
Re: RIAA at it again... er still
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 10:19 am
by THE JEW (RaVeN)
Re: RIAA at it again... er still
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 3:04 pm
by THE JEW (RaVeN)
Makes the US almost seem professional:
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news ... d-fine.arsThe 70,000 daily visitors to popular music site RnBXclusive.com were met with a purposely terrifying message on Tuesday and part of Wednesday. The UK's Serious Organized Crime Agency (SOCA) took the site down, arrested its operator, and threw up a splash page that warned downloaders of "up to 10 years imprisonment." Thought statutory damages of up to $150,000 per infringement in the US were ludicrous? SOCA warns that downloaders from the site could face an "unlimited fine under UK law."