Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2003 11:10 am
Assuming its compatible with both...
Page 2 of 2
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2003 4:03 pm
I think the chances of it not being compatible are pretty much zero, things are pretty standardized these days.
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2003 4:58 pm
So? Its the principle of the argument.
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2003 5:04 pm
I think a mac is a mac not a PC. Just the way I define them, If i say PC im not talking about a mac. They may be PC,s in others eyes but in mine they will always be a dreaded mac.
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2003 5:25 pm
Yes well, as your avatar depicts, your eyes arent all that reliable.
*drum line*
*drum line*
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2003 3:33 pm
Pinter discovered this add in a Wired magazine at my house, which might shed some light on the subject.
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2003 4:50 pm
Well the poll resuts say it all.
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2003 5:05 pm
Good Job Jon
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2003 6:20 pm
that's society's definition, not mine.
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2003 7:57 pm
No body cares about yours LOL
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2003 8:11 pm
lol
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2003 9:37 pm
that's fine, it's still my defenition Personal Computer = any computer you use for personal use
Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2003 9:38 am
Macs are still slower at a much higher price point, though:
http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,a ... g,8,00.asp
http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,a ... g,8,00.asp
Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2003 12:43 pm
I don't think that any of us are arguing that Mac's are good in any way. We are just discussing the meaning of the letters PC.
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2003 1:25 am
ya ive come to the conclusion of "what the hell are we bickering about". This is getting funnier and funnier. I still stand by that a mac is a mac. But I also stand by that it doesnt have to have Windows on it to be a PC. It can be running Linux and still be a PC. A Mac has only Mac products in it whiel a PC can have a variaty of different brands in it.